<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[About using bots on lemmy.today]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>About using bots on lemmy.today</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">There has been quite a few reports lately about people using bots and llms to create and upvote content. I wanted to make a post to discuss this.</p>
<p dir="auto">In my opinion, bots are a tool to quickly create or repost content. And its how users <em>use</em> that tool that is important for weather or not it will make lemmy a better or worse place.</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Two examples:</strong></p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>User A</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>User A frequently visits reddit and would like to quickly share content that he thinks is actually good and would be liked on lemmy.</li>
<li>He uses a bot or some other tool to do this quickly and conveniently.</li>
<li>Most of the posts are generally liked by the community, sometimes ending up on the frontpage, with many comments from many different users.</li>
<li>A few users are complaining about bot content but the majority seems to appreciate the posts.</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><strong>User B</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>User B also uses a similar repost bot or a llm to generate content, but they decide that lemmy needs a lot of content and it doesnt matter so much weather or not its actually good.</li>
<li>The main idea is to repost or generate as much as possible and lets users decide what they like.</li>
<li>They create 30 posts in a day, where almost none of them are actually interesting for the lemmy community. Posts have no comments, and most of them are only upvoted by other bot users.</li>
<li>Many users are complaining that they now see tons of low quality posts in their feeds because of this user.</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><strong>How will we moderate this</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">In my mind, the lemmy community is fine with user A but not user B. So it requires moderators to make a decision about the content someone is creating. Does it make lemmy better or worse for the majority?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thats how Im thinking about this, and if you want to share your own ideas or comments, I would love reading them. If you agree, easiest way is to upvote. If you dont, I would love a comment even more so I can understand some other point of view. :)</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/042ecc38-2bf3-4964-ba8e-dab47498327c/about-using-bots-on-lemmy.today</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 16:51:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/042ecc38-2bf3-4964-ba8e-dab47498327c.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 09:59:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to About using bots on lemmy.today on Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:13:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Probably a good general rule that bots should be marked as a bot, either by name or the user setting. That's the only extra bit I can think of and I fully agree.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.today/comment/26248048</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.today/comment/26248048</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[newdark@lemmy.today]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:13:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>