<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[is correlation (not causation) ever significant enough to justify your attention?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">correlation does not equal causation.</p>
<p dir="auto">indeed it does not.</p>
<p dir="auto">but correlation can lead to discovering causation or even larger phenomena. which is why i pay attention to "it" when appropriate. do you?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/06f2eea0-0941-4da5-b3ad-a77a949e7fc4/is-correlation-not-causation-ever-significant-enough-to-justify-your-attention</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:46:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/06f2eea0-0941-4da5-b3ad-a77a949e7fc4.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 03:46:12 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>