<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why don’t we separate the art from the artist?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">With the rise of cancel culture, it’s something that’s got me curious, why are so many works (music, literature, tv shows, etc.) no longer separated from their controversial makers? Is it purely to do with money (e.g. not wanting to give money to people you don’t agree with?) and what about controversial people who are dead? They don’t gain anything, so why isn’t the art separated from the artist? What’s your opinion on this topic?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/196a198d-306f-40cb-bc8b-9d6a2c13378f/why-don-t-we-separate-the-art-from-the-artist</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:47:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/196a198d-306f-40cb-bc8b-9d6a2c13378f.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:14:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>