Final Unicourse'tan Çalış, Yüksek Notu Garantile!
Vizesine Unicourse'tan Çalış, Yüksek Notu Garantile!
AI fails badly in discussing books I am reading
-
I did have a much better discussion of 'Moby Dick' a while ago, but I imagine there is lots of info that AI has scraped from scholarly articles and the like about classics.
They don't do well with big sources like books unless they're discussed. If there's no online references or scholarly articles it won't know the contents of the book. Same with movies or music.
-
It appeared it had access to the entire book - it linked me to a website that somehow had the text. I was able to coax better responses out of it when I corrected its mistakes about plot etc.
It appeared it had access
Unless you provided it, the context window did not have the context. “Appeared to” is also not a valid way to evaluate technology.
-
Probability machine prone to hallucinations is how I call them.
hallucinations
No need to humanize them, they are Markov machines. That is all.
-
Ha ha. I'm experimenting with the technology.
Don't.
Next time just make a «[Discussion][Help] ’s Rivers of London — Ben Aaronvitch 9780575097568»🧵, and wait for everyone else interested in responding to do so.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Kayıt Ol Giriş