<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Primary school says kids should only have fruits or veggies as snacks, "proved" to be better for concentration/focus. What does science say?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Of course kids should eat healthy, but a quick web search seem to disprove that higher calories snacks have a negative effect. Papers I found are <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0195666390900519" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0195666390900519</a>  and  <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S003193840200882X" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S003193840200882X</a></p>
<p dir="auto">School goes as far as preventing the kids to eat their snack if it's not a fruit or a vegetable which I find excessive, as many healthy snacks exist today that still contain some (more) carbs (the two papers are even about candies...)</p>
<p dir="auto">Are there some studies out there for what would be an optimal snack (both health and performance wise)?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/6745e60c-1e58-4a11-9856-33355be8cbe1/primary-school-says-kids-should-only-have-fruits-or-veggies-as-snacks-proved-to-be-better-for-concentration-focus.-what-does-science-say</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 03:53:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/6745e60c-1e58-4a11-9856-33355be8cbe1.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:18:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>