<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Opinion on MOC design]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I'm designing a new MOC for my NeoClassic Space Moonbase: A tracked dumper like the ones from <a href="https://www.ntdh.co.uk/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.ntdh.co.uk/</a> which I've seen at the Whitchurch channel breach, but, of course, "spacified" with a blue cabin and engine cabinet.</p>
<p dir="auto">Now I'm not the LEGO technic guy, and for the tread assembly, I've found the piece 32272 (Technic, Liftarm, Modified Bent Thick 1 x 9 (7 - 3)), which would make a for me perfect spacing to place the outermost gears. Sadly, this piece has axle holes instead of pin holes at the ends. So I could make a plain show piece where the tracks can't move as the axle with the gear can't turn.</p>
<p dir="auto">So, what is your opinion: Is a static model sitting on a display OK, or should I find ways to make the tread "spin", even though it will never move?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/68e3b793-9fca-42a9-ae85-2fc2d6658793/opinion-on-moc-design</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:12:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/68e3b793-9fca-42a9-ae85-2fc2d6658793.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 07:55:05 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>