<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Interested in film photography, question about costs]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">A thrift-store lens came attached to a Canon Rebel Ti, so I ended up with both.  It looks like a hideous lump of early 2000s plastic, but it's functional and I remember how much I wanted an SLR of that type back when I was a kid.</p>
<p dir="auto">Anyway, that's all to say that I picked up a roll of Fujifilm 400 color yesterday, started shooting, and am having a great time.  The only thing stopping me from going out and buying a whole stack of different film types is thinking about the cost of getting anything developed.</p>
<p dir="auto">My local camera store charges ~$6 per roll to develop negatives, and ~$22 per roll for prints.  Doable for me, but I'm also a cheapskate.</p>
<p dir="auto">I like the idea of learning darkroom development, and developing negatives seems relatively straightforward, but actually making prints with an enlarger seems like something else.  I'm not sure I have the space or the money for one.  My local camera store includes free scans with every set of negatives, so for $6 I could at least have something, but only ending up with digitals feels like a "why bother" case.</p>
<p dir="auto">Maybe I should just accept that this is a hobby that will cost me, but I'm curious what other people do.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/8a45af92-5e3b-49de-94d7-ee6beaa764c7/interested-in-film-photography-question-about-costs</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 17:59:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/8a45af92-5e3b-49de-94d7-ee6beaa764c7.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:36:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>