<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Knit the family together (1956)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">$1 in 1956 is about $12 in 2026 dollars. So that $2/3min LA to DC rate is around $24/3min. That is the evening rate! Long distance rates were higher during the day.</p>
<p dir="auto">And another plug in this ad for number dialing, which had only been around since about 1951 in any real way.</p>


<div class="row mt-3"><div class="col-12 mt-3"><img class="img-thumbnail" src="https://media.piefed.ca/posts/5D/Xm/5DXmruUsR8K5Lr7.jpg" alt="Link Preview Image" /></div></div>]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/9490bcd0-eff9-46b9-a096-f219f3396c63/knit-the-family-together-1956</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 06:01:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/9490bcd0-eff9-46b9-a096-f219f3396c63.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 18:56:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Knit the family together (1956) on Wed, 19 Aug 2026 01:52:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I spend significantly more for telephone service today than I did before cellular.    People should do the math to see how much they spend per minute today and see just how badly they're getting ripped off.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.today/comment/26035095</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.today/comment/26035095</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[echo@lemmy.today]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 01:52:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Knit the family together (1956) on Tue, 18 Aug 2026 23:57:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">For some reason, perhaps because of the style, the wording or the typefaces in the ad, it brought to mind some vintage pharmaceutical advertising from the same year -- <a href="http://www.bonkersinstitute.org/medshow/thorazchild.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.bonkersinstitute.org/medshow/thorazchild.html</a> (the whole Thorazine ad series is really something: <a href="http://www.bonkersinstitute.org/medshow/thorazine.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.bonkersinstitute.org/medshow/thorazine.html</a> )</p>
<p dir="auto">Perhaps the young chap in the ad would benefit from a friendly chat on the phone before heavy antipsychotics are brought to bear!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://sh.itjust.works/comment/26969274</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://sh.itjust.works/comment/26969274</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dparticiple@sh.itjust.works]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 23:57:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>