<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Question for scifi worldbuilding: could Nuclear Thermal Rockets have higher thrust?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">NERVA has about 250 kN of thrust at 841 seconds of specific impulse.<br />
Merlin 1D has about 1000 kN of thrust at 311 seconds of specific impulse.<br />
That suggests NTRs have around 4x less thrust, but around 2.7z more efficiency than chemical rockets. At a large enough scale craft, the weight of the engine could be considered irrelevant. But for smaller crafts, the Merlin has a thrust to weight ratio of 184:1, whereas NTRs only ever achieved 7:1 (they hoped to get up to around 35:1 eventually).</p>
<p dir="auto">I imagine the thrust to weight could be substantially improved by making lightweight reactors, but I'm wondering if anybody knows anything about concepts for higher thrust NTRs?</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA</a><br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Merlin" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Merlin</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/959b43b4-9d7a-4d41-a7f7-91666842f70d/question-for-scifi-worldbuilding-could-nuclear-thermal-rockets-have-higher-thrust</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 18:13:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/959b43b4-9d7a-4d41-a7f7-91666842f70d.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 21:32:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>