<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[A solar powered website that goes offline when there's no power]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">This website made me reconsider if 99.9999% SLA and always online is really that important for lots of websites. I used to self-host my own server in my own apartment, but gave up on that after my internet provider had their first major outage that lasted almost a week. Also I didn't want to worry about the fire hazard, or the server going down when I was traveling etc.</p>
<p dir="auto">But a solar powered server seems interesting, if the batteries could be made fire safe.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/b15c2c8a-cb8a-4456-ac26-7faa6cddbf1c/a-solar-powered-website-that-goes-offline-when-there-s-no-power</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:04:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/b15c2c8a-cb8a-4456-ac26-7faa6cddbf1c.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 06:23:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A solar powered website that goes offline when there's no power on Tue, 18 Aug 2026 07:24:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">You're better off with the LiFePO4 batteries even if you don't care about weight. A lead acid battery will wear out quickly when you cycle it daily. Lithium also has a higher charging efficiency, so you get more usable power from the solar panel.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/27624284</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/27624284</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 07:24:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>