<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[If the US medical system is hypothetically killing off all the poor people, doesn't that mean that fewer doctors will be required as well?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Everyone keeps saying, the US is trying to kill off its poor with its medical industry.</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm assuming the ideal population size, in this scenario, is around the number of millionaires there are in the world. And, doctors fit snuggly into that bracket.</p>
<p dir="auto">What happens when population goes down? There isn't going to be need for as many doctors. And, finance 101 says you need an ever running stream of revenue, or your income fails. You can't live off of nesteggs.</p>
<p dir="auto">Combine that with the fact that states like Utah are making it legal for AI to practice medicine. And I have to ask, under this scenario, do all these doctors think they're going to survive? Especially the ones who couldn't make it in the big cities?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/c6408869-c483-4cf6-b28a-4274c2721e57/if-the-us-medical-system-is-hypothetically-killing-off-all-the-poor-people-doesn-t-that-mean-that-fewer-doctors-will-be-required-as-well</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 01:52:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/c6408869-c483-4cf6-b28a-4274c2721e57.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:18:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>