<![CDATA[Theophile Roederer & Co Champagne (1897)]]>This one is not Mucha, but rather, a certain Louis Théophile Hingre (1832-1911).

Also from Hingre,

Hingre art

Hingre art

Link Preview Image
]]>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/cfed6dc8-167a-48fe-bcaf-34bdb5720ae1/theophile-roederer-co-champagne-1897RSS for NodeSun, 06 Sep 2026 04:28:45 GMTSat, 05 Sep 2026 20:20:12 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Theophile Roederer & Co Champagne (1897) on Sat, 05 Sep 2026 21:13:33 GMT]]>I think Mucha started his theater posters at the end of 1894, so this is probably a sign of his influence already.

His other work beside the Art Noveau posters is brilliant too, though. Both Le Pater and The Slav Epic have some great works in them.

]]>https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://feddit.nu/comment/21841257https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://feddit.nu/comment/21841257Sat, 05 Sep 2026 21:13:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Theophile Roederer & Co Champagne (1897) on Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:41:47 GMT]]>I don't know enough about art history to comment knowledgeably on whether it was ahead of its time, but I did read that Mucha didn't like this style himself, despite it being what he is known for today. I have the impression Art Nouveau gained a lot of steam in the 1890s, so '97 would have been right in there, but an art aficionado can probably chime in here with better info than I can.

]]>https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://piefed.ca/comment/6181432https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://piefed.ca/comment/6181432Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:41:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Theophile Roederer & Co Champagne (1897) on Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:26:51 GMT]]>Damn thats beautiful. Ahead of its time art wise too, right? Very Mucha-esque

]]>https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.cafe/comment/18908031https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.cafe/comment/18908031Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:26:51 GMT