<![CDATA[Can Alzheimer's Spread Through Blood Transfusions? Here's What We Know.]]>This post did not contain any content.]]>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/d9b5550b-bcb0-40e3-9f7b-ef977d457220/can-alzheimer-s-spread-through-blood-transfusions-here-s-what-we-know.RSS for NodeSat, 05 Sep 2026 16:56:47 GMTTue, 25 Aug 2026 08:54:35 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Can Alzheimer's Spread Through Blood Transfusions? Here's What We Know. on Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:26:46 GMT]]>Anytime an article says "here's what we know" I classify them as quota articles.

]]>https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.world/comment/25474961https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.world/comment/25474961Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:26:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Can Alzheimer's Spread Through Blood Transfusions? Here's What We Know. on Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:37:31 GMT]]>Article contains a lot of words like "suggest" and "maybe," and no actual statistical data. The implication from the headline may be correct or may be a false conclusion drawn from statistical trends driven by other, unidentified factors.

Based on the quoted statements, the researchers themselves seem like they believe that they're justified in following this question, but not sufficiently justified in making any solid conclusions.

If you have time to read the associated studies, it might be worth it, but the linked article itself is mostly premature fluff, and the title and excerpt are 100% clickbait.

]]>https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.ml/comment/27437381https://forum.ieu.app/post/https://lemmy.ml/comment/27437381Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:37:31 GMT