<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Doesn't tying income class to moving targets within those classes defeat the point of measuring them?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The US Census Bureau defines lower class as the lowest 20% of incomes.</p>
<p dir="auto">Pew defines it as the lowest 2/3 of the median.</p>
<p dir="auto">If the highest income is $100, 20% is $20.</p>
<p dir="auto">At 2/3 the median, if the median is $30, lower-class is $20.</p>
<p dir="auto">Is there a reason they're tying income classes to people within those classes, and not what it costs to survive within the economy?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.ieu.app/topic/e06b728b-c45c-4016-8dd0-e89144fb52ed/doesn-t-tying-income-class-to-moving-targets-within-those-classes-defeat-the-point-of-measuring-them</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 21:10:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.ieu.app/topic/e06b728b-c45c-4016-8dd0-e89144fb52ed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 03:19:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>