Bad Sources, Bad Methods, Bad Science

[[[global:guest]]]

Whether intentional or not, the scientific community on this planet is a joke.

Example #1: The wikipedia page for the Asteroid Belt links its 9th source to a junk science article published by CosmosUp in 2016. In the article, it states that mathematical models show that there should have been a planet there, then follows it up with this garbage... "Despite what conspiracy theorists may say on the internet; these billions of little asteroids never formed into a planet." Then jumps through hoops trying to justify the baseless claim. The most hilarious thing is, you can look at the picture on the top right of the wikipedia page and see clearly where the leftover debris field from the collision currently sits labeled as L4 and L5 trojans. Calling knowledge of basic physics a "conspiracy theory" is quite the choice.

Example #2: Papyrus pulled from the Wadi el-Jarif site in 2013 known as the Logbook of Merer, which describes the movement of stone from the quarries to the location of the pyramid area. The Great Pyramid is referred to as Akhet-Khufu which should tell you two things... That the pyramid was already built, and that a guy named Khufu slapped his name on it. NOTHING MORE! The movement of stone was for the creation of the outer complex. People have used this papyrus to claim that Khufu built the pyramids. The only thing you can infer is that he, at most, had them repaired after re-discovering them, yet it is used multiple times as a source to wrongly date the Pyramids of Giza. All pyramids built after circa 12,700 B.C. are tombs because the survivors didn't have the ability to replicate the function, and their decendants just copied the form.

Example #3: The fractals that cover nearly every part of the planet are "natural" because they were ALL caused by lightning. Natural is in quotes because that lightning was intentionally charged and unintentionally triggered (The Discharge, Next post). The fractals on the coasts of Norway and Greenland still exist because the cold weather froze the earth enough that it protected the damage from being swept away by the tides. The fractals on the rivers come in two forms; the ones that existed before the event, and the ones created after. Rivers from before the event have clear markings extending away from the banks. Waterways created after run through the valleys carved out by lightning that filled in later. The only place on the planet where you cannot find fractals burned/scarred into the earth are places covered in ice, some swampland in northern Asia, and the muskeg of northern Canada.

Example #4: Deserts. There is no scientifically logical reason for the deserts on the planet to be positioned where they are. Once you look at them from google earth you will see the enormous electric scars and fractal burns that are the direct reason for them being deserts today. The reason global warming is ramping up so quickly (besides the pollution and population) is because we lost a massive amount of plant life and the planet has yet to recover from that. Now that the weather systems are settling back into their natural, pre-event cycles, things are going to get worse before they get better.

Example #5: Pre 12,700 B.C. Megastructures. The entire planet was literally bathed in lightning, which turned these structures into ruins and flash melted them into what we see today. The dating on them cannot be accurately judged because, due to lack of info, people don't take the event into account. You can find many geology experts weighing in on the subject and the problems with their methodology are obvious.

The next post will covers circa 50k B.C. to the event I call The Discharge.